DOES THE OPEN BOOK PREPARE US FOR JUDGMENT?

“The secret of the LORD is with them that fear him; and he will shew them his covenant” (Psalm 25:14, KJV).

ABSTRACT

The unsealed prophecies of Daniel and Revelation call the community to readiness as Christ ministers in the heavenly sanctuary before probation closes.

WHY MUST WE FACE THE LIVING RECORD?

Above the noise of human history a quiet, methodical work now unfolds in the heavenly sanctuary. Every name that has ever been registered as a professed follower of Christ comes under solemn review before His appearing in glory. The pioneer voices of the Advent movement have long testified that the antitypical Day of Atonement began in 1844, when our Lord entered the most holy place to cleanse the records of His people. The apostle Paul fixed the central truth when he wrote, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10, KJV). Solomon set the same warning over the whole of human conduct: “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Ecclesiastes 12:14, KJV). The vision of Daniel showed the courtroom itself, for he beheld until “the judgment was set, and the books were opened” (Daniel 7:10, KJV).

WHAT BOOKS REGISTER EVERY HUMAN DEED?

Heavenly judgment proceeds from written records that contain the entire moral history of every professing soul. Human courts judge from outward appearance, while the celestial tribunal probes motive, thought, and silent influence with perfect accuracy. The apostle John saw the books opened at the end and wrote, “And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works” (Revelation 20:12, KJV). The prophet Daniel had already beheld the same scene in vision, declaring, “A fiery stream issued and came forth from before him: thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him: the judgment was set, and the books were opened” (Daniel 7:10, KJV). Malachi described another volume kept above for the faithful, for “then they that feared the LORD spake often one to another: and the LORD hearkened, and heard it, and a book of remembrance was written before him for them that feared the LORD, and that thought upon his name” (Malachi 3:16, KJV). Paul reduced the universal scope of the inquiry to a single line: “So then every one of us shall give account of himself to God” (Romans 14:12, KJV). The writer of Hebrews settled the order between death and judgment with equal economy: “And it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment” (Hebrews 9:27, KJV).

Pioneer Adventist exposition gathered these scriptures into a single doctrine of the pre-Advent investigative judgment. Uriah Smith, in his classic exposition Daniel and Revelation, identified the courtroom of Daniel 7 as the very session in which our cases are now being decided before the second coming of Christ. The inspired pen confirms the same point with unmistakable directness: “The books of record in heaven, in which the names and the deeds of men are registered, are to determine the decisions of the judgment” (The Great Controversy, p. 480, 1911). The prophetic messenger adds a sobering note about the breadth of the inquiry, for “every man’s work passes in review before God and is registered for faithfulness or unfaithfulness” (The Great Controversy, p. 482, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told that nothing slips by unnoticed, since “every temptation resisted, every evil overcome, every word of tender pity expressed, is faithfully chronicled; and every act of sacrifice, every suffering and sorrow endured for Christ’s sake, is recorded” (The Great Controversy, p. 481, 1911). The same chapter exposes the dark column of the ledger, for “opposite each name in the books of heaven is entered with terrible exactness every wrong word, every selfish act, every unfulfilled duty, and every secret sin, with every artful dissembling” (The Great Controversy, p. 482, 1911). In The Great Controversy we read the further reminder that “heaven-sent warnings or reproofs neglected, wasted moments, unimproved opportunities, the influence exerted for good or for evil, with its far-reaching results, all are chronicled by the recording angel” (The Great Controversy, p. 482, 1911). A passage from the same volume settles the timing for us, for “the work of the investigative judgment and the blotting out of sins is to be accomplished before the second advent of the Lord” (The Great Controversy, p. 485, 1911). We therefore live with the steady awareness that today’s words and choices are writing the page that the Great Umpire will read aloud.

The pioneer Sabbatarian Advent movement carried this courtroom doctrine forward against fierce theological opposition from every side. Historic Protestantism had largely collapsed the entire judgment into a single end-time event at the second coming. Roman Catholicism, in contrast, multiplied private judgments at the hour of death and at the imagined fires of purgatory. The Sabbatarian Adventists alone retained the biblical sequence of an investigative judgment preceding the second coming, a millennial judgment of the wicked by the saints, and an executive judgment at the end of the thousand years. This three-stage scheme protects the moral universe from arbitrary verdicts and demonstrates the holy openness of God’s government before angels and unfallen worlds. The Father is willing to expose every record so that no creature may ever charge Him with injustice in the eternity to come. For us in this generation the practical application falls squarely on the present hour, since every careless word and every secret cherished sin is now being recorded against names that may yet stand in the book of life. Daily prayer must take account of the fact that even unconscious habits and quiet motives leave their mark on the chronicle of heaven. Watchfulness over the inner life therefore replaces the false security that flows from outward profession or denominational membership. Morning devotion must include a deliberate review of the previous day in the same spirit in which the angels open the books above the throne. The pioneer pen of J.N. Andrews insisted that the heavenly sanctuary message gives the only consistent account of how God can pardon the sinner and still vindicate His law. We close this section with a single quiet question that opens the next: how can the entries already made against our names be removed before the verdict closes our case?

DOES TRUE CONFESSION REACH MERCY?

The conditions of pardon stand fixed in the moral order of God’s government and cannot be softened by sentiment. Mercy meets the sinner where confession is full and where sin is forsaken, not where guilt is merely felt. Solomon wrote the contract in plain words, declaring, “He that covereth his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall have mercy” (Proverbs 28:13, KJV). The apostle John added the corresponding promise of cleansing for the contrite, writing, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9, KJV). Peter pressed both elements together when he preached, “Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord” (Acts 3:19, KJV). Isaiah voiced the divine appeal that calls every wanderer home, for “let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon” (Isaiah 55:7, KJV).

Personal experience must move beyond outward reform to the deep cleansing that David begged of the Lord, for he prayed, “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me” (Psalm 51:10, KJV). Joel pressed the same inwardness on a careless people, urging, “And rend your heart, and not your garments, and turn unto the LORD your God: for he is gracious and merciful, slow to anger, and of great kindness, and repenteth him of the evil” (Joel 2:13, KJV). The inspired pen brings the doctrine into focus with a definition that has steadied generations of seekers: “Repentance includes sorrow for sin and a turning away from it. We shall not renounce sin unless we see its sinfulness; until we turn away from it in heart, there will be no real change in the life” (Steps to Christ, p. 23, 1892). The prophetic messenger immediately follows that definition with the sweet motive of all true turning, for “it is the goodness of God that leads us to repentance. His tender, pitying love seeks to break the heart of the sinner and awaken in the soul a desire to come to God” (Steps to Christ, p. 27, 1892). Through inspired counsel we are told that the standard remains unmoved by human weakness, since “the condition of eternal life is now just what it always has been—just what it was in Paradise before the fall of our first parents—perfect obedience to the law of God, perfect righteousness” (Steps to Christ, p. 62, 1892). A passage from The Great Controversy ties confession to the heavenly ledger directly, for “sins that have not been repented of and forsaken will not be pardoned and blotted out of the books of record, but will stand to witness against the sinner in the day of God” (The Great Controversy, p. 486, 1911). The inspired pen offers the corresponding promise to those who lay every cherished idol down, for “those who have truly repented of sin, and by faith claimed the blood of Christ as their atoning sacrifice, have had pardon entered against their names in the books of heaven” (The Great Controversy, p. 483, 1911). In The Great Controversy we read that this matter cannot be postponed, since “while Jesus is pleading for the subjects of His grace, Satan accuses them before God as transgressors” (The Great Controversy, p. 484, 1911). Confession therefore demands the breadth of our sin and the present moment of our repentance, for nothing else reaches the books in time.

A real danger lies in the false comfort that has been called cheap grace, in which sin is excused without the inward turning that Scripture requires. The pioneer pen of E.J. Waggoner pressed home in Christ and His Righteousness that the same gospel which justifies the sinner also separates him from the sin he once loved. Genuine repentance therefore wears two visible marks, namely an honest naming of the wrong and a quiet, steady refusal to return to it. Daniel set the example of the first mark when, in the closing chapter of his book, he confessed the sins of his people in the first person plural rather than blaming earlier generations. David set the example of the second mark when, after Nathan exposed his hidden adultery, he poured out the fifty-first psalm and brought forth the fruits of a softened heart for the rest of his days. Modern devotional life must therefore include the practice of bringing specific sins by name to the foot of the cross rather than offering general regrets to a vague Heaven. The community must equally guard against the casual handling of sin in the body of the church, since hidden transgression among professing members will follow the records into the heavenly courtroom. Family worship in the home and quiet accountability among trusted friends become powerful aids in the work of forsaking what God has forgiven. We close with the question that drives the next section, for when Satan steps forward to accuse our confessed sins, who pleads our case in the courtroom above?

WHO PLEADS WHEN SATAN ACCUSES US?

The repentant sinner does not stand alone before the bar of heaven, for an Advocate of perfect righteousness pleads every confessed case. The accuser of the brethren brings the unbroken record of failure, while Christ presents His own wounds as the answer of mercy. The apostle John named our defender plainly, writing, “My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous” (1 John 2:1, KJV). Paul reinforced the certainty of the defense, asking, “Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us” (Romans 8:34, KJV). The writer of Hebrews fixed the scope of His saving power in a single sentence, for “wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them” (Hebrews 7:25, KJV). The same epistle invites us to draw near with the boldness of children rather than the cringing of slaves, declaring, “Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need” (Hebrews 4:16, KJV). Paul reduced the entire mediation to one principle of access, writing, “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5, KJV). Zechariah saw the very scene in prophetic vision, recording, “And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him” (Zechariah 3:1, KJV).

The inspired pen describes the courtroom drama with arresting clarity: “While Jesus is pleading for the subjects of His grace, Satan accuses them before God as transgressors. The great deceiver has sought to lead them into skepticism, to cause them to lose confidence in God” (The Great Controversy, p. 484, 1911). Our defense is not the denial of guilt but the substitution of righteousness, for “Jesus does not excuse their sins, but shows their penitence and faith, and, claiming for them forgiveness, He lifts His wounded hands before the Father and the holy angels, saying: I know them by name. I have graven them on the palms of my hands” (The Great Controversy, p. 484, 1911). In The Desire of Ages we read of the breadth of His sympathy: “Christ looked upon the distress of the human race with infinite pity. His heart was moved by the cry of those who came to Him for help” (The Desire of Ages, p. 366, 1898). The prophetic messenger anchors our hope in His unchanging office, since “Christ is the connecting link between God and man. He has promised His personal intercession. He places the merit of His righteousness in the scale of justice for the sinner who believes” (Selected Messages, Book 1, p. 392, 1958). Through inspired counsel we are told that the Savior’s own scars are the everlasting witness in our defense, for “the wounds of Calvary will appear in His glorified body to all eternity. Every mark of the humiliation of our Lord is His honor” (The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 3, p. 247, 1878). A passage from Christ’s Object Lessons reminds us why the case can be won, for “Christ is waiting with longing desire for the manifestation of Himself in His church. When the character of Christ shall be perfectly reproduced in His people, then He will come to claim them as His own” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 69, 1900). The pioneer expositor J.N. Andrews insisted in his sanctuary writings that the high-priestly ministry of Christ stands at the very center of the gospel and forms the only ground of our confidence in the judgment. We therefore rest our defense on the cross presented in the courtroom, not on any plea of personal merit.

The intercession of Christ is not the persuasion of a reluctant Father but the presentation of an accomplished sacrifice to a loving Father. The book of Hebrews sets out this truth at length, comparing the high-priestly garments of Aaron with the wounds and merits of our Lord. The vision of Joshua and the angel of the Lord in Zechariah three is the fullest picture of the courtroom transaction we possess in the Old Testament. Joshua stands clothed in filthy garments, Satan stands at his right hand to accuse, and the Lord rebukes the adversary and clothes the high priest with change of raiment. The pioneer expositor S.N. Haskell drew out the parallel in his sanctuary studies and showed that every confessed sinner is now in the position of Joshua, defended by the very Lord whom Joshua served. Practical Christian life flows from this vision in two directions at once. First, we no longer need to plead our own goodness in prayer, since the High Priest has already deposited a perfect righteousness in our account. Second, we no longer need to fear the accusations of conscience or of the adversary, since the verdict turns on the merits of Christ rather than on the strength of our memory of past sins. Family devotion, midweek prayer, and Sabbath worship together build into the soul the steady confidence of a defended people. We close with the question that opens the next section, for how does this present ministry of Christ fulfill the prophetic shadow of the ancient Day of Atonement?

ARE WE NOW IN THE GREAT ATONEMENT?

The antitypical Day of Atonement opened in 1844 and continues until the close of probation. The Mosaic ritual served as a preview of the heavenly work in which Christ now ministers in the most holy place. Daniel measured the prophetic interval that brought us into this final phase, recording, “And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed” (Daniel 8:14, KJV). John saw the same change of phase in apocalyptic vision, declaring, “And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail” (Revelation 11:19, KJV). Daniel described the moment of standing up above, writing, “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation” (Daniel 12:1, KJV). Moses laid down the original ordinance of the day in solemn terms, commanding, “For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the LORD” (Leviticus 16:30, KJV). The same chapter required the inward labor that always accompanied the outward rite, for “it shall be a sabbath of rest unto you, and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever” (Leviticus 16:31, KJV). The writer of Hebrews fixed the heavenly reality behind the type, declaring, “For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us” (Hebrews 9:24, KJV).

Pioneer Sabbatarian Adventist exposition gathered these texts into the doctrine that distinguished the movement from every other Christian body. Uriah Smith, James White, and J.N. Andrews argued at length from Daniel 8:14 that the cleansing of the sanctuary belonged to the heavenly tabernacle, not to the earth, and that it began in the autumn of 1844. The inspired pen confirms our position in this final hour with characteristic plainness, declaring, “We are now living in the great day of atonement” (The Great Controversy, p. 489, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told that the inward duty matches the outward type, for “in the typical service, while the high priest was making the atonement for Israel, all were required to afflict their souls by repentance of sin and humiliation before the Lord” (The Great Controversy, p. 489, 1911). The prophetic messenger adds a clarifying line for those tempted to push the work into the future, since “coincident with the closing work of the gospel ministry, the work of cleansing the sanctuary in heaven was to begin” (The Great Controversy, p. 421, 1911). A passage from The Great Controversy ties this period to the change of Christ’s ministry, for “at the termination of the 2300 days, in 1844, Christ then entered the most holy place of the heavenly sanctuary, to perform the closing work of the atonement” (The Great Controversy, p. 422, 1911). The same chapter underlines the personal stakes of the doctrine, declaring, “Attended by heavenly angels, our great High Priest enters the holy of holies, and there appears in the presence of God, to engage in the last acts of His ministration in behalf of man—to perform the work of investigative judgment” (The Great Controversy, p. 480, 1911). The inspired pen further presses home the urgency: “The subject of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment should be clearly understood by the people of God” (The Great Controversy, p. 488, 1911). We therefore stand in the closing hours of the antitypical Day of Atonement and labor with the same heart-searching the ancient camp practiced before the mercy seat.

The historical setting of this doctrine in the rise of the Advent movement deserves quiet reflection in every generation. William Miller and his colleagues had preached, on the basis of Daniel 8:14, that Christ would return to cleanse the earth at the close of the 2300 prophetic days. The fall of 1844 came and Christ did not appear in the clouds, and the believing remnant passed through what they later named the Great Disappointment. In the days that followed, faithful students opened their Bibles again and traced the sanctuary through Hebrews and through Daniel and through Leviticus. Hiram Edson received conviction as he crossed a cornfield that the cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8:14 belonged to a heavenly tabernacle, not to the earth. James White, Joseph Bates, and the young Ellen Harmon Gould White confirmed the discovery in study and in vision, and the doctrine of Christ’s entry into the most holy place in 1844 became the cornerstone that distinguished the Sabbatarian Adventist movement from every other Christian body. The pioneer expositor J.N. Andrews wrote at length in his sanctuary tracts that this truth gives the only consistent answer to the disappointment and the only adequate framework for the third angel’s message. The community today therefore inherits a doctrinal treasure paid for in the prayer and patience of those early decades. The practical effect upon us is unmistakable, for we know exactly where our High Priest stands and exactly what work He is now performing on our behalf. We close with the question that opens the next section, for if the judgment exposes every record so completely, what becomes of the love of God in the verdict?

The typology of Leviticus sixteen rewards close, careful study and remains the most concentrated picture of the gospel in the Old Testament. The high priest washed himself, set aside his ordinary garments of glory, and put on the simple linen robes of the day. He took blood from the sin offering, entered the most holy place, and sprinkled it before the mercy seat above the ark of the testimony. The whole congregation stood outside the camp, afflicting their souls in solemn fasting and prayer while the priest performed his ministry within the veil. After the cleansing of the sanctuary, the priest came out, laid the sins symbolically upon the head of the scapegoat, and the goat was led away into the wilderness to perish. The pioneer Sabbatarian writers identified the scapegoat, called Azazel in the Hebrew, with Satan rather than with Christ, since the goat received the cleansed sins after the atonement was already complete. This typology preserves the doctrine of the cross from confusion, since Christ alone bears the sin of the world as the sin offering, while the originator of evil receives back his own work at the close of the great controversy. The community must therefore study Leviticus sixteen and Hebrews nine together, allowing the type and the antitype to interpret one another. Daily worship and Sabbath fellowship grow richer when these patterns are kept clearly in view.

WHY DOES MERCY ATTEND EVERY VERDICT?

The judgment is not a contradiction of divine love but its most luminous demonstration. Every record opened in heaven is matched by a wound shown on the body of the Advocate. David wrote the character of the Judge in lines of mercy, declaring, “The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy” (Psalm 103:8, KJV). The writer of Hebrews removed any image of a distant tribunal, for “we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin” (Hebrews 4:15, KJV). Paul anchored the timing of love in the very moment of our worst, writing, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8, KJV). Jeremiah heard the voice of everlasting affection from above, recording, “Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love: therefore with lovingkindness have I drawn thee” (Jeremiah 31:3, KJV). The Lord answered Israel’s fear of being forgotten in language no tribunal can erase, declaring, “Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee” (Isaiah 49:15, KJV). The same prophet confirmed the engraving of every name on the very hands of the Mediator, writing, “Behold, I have graven thee upon the palms of my hands” (Isaiah 49:16, KJV).

The inspired pen sets our whole understanding of the courtroom inside this affection, for “the matchless love of God for a world that did not love Him! The thought has a subduing power upon the soul and brings the mind into captivity to the will of God” (The Great Controversy, p. 651, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told the cross is the great pulpit from which divine love is preached, since “the sacrifice of Christ as an atonement for sin is the great truth around which all other truths cluster” (The Great Controversy, p. 652, 1911). In Steps to Christ we read of the personal pursuit of every soul, for “the heart of God yearns over His earthly children with a love stronger than death. In giving up His Son, He has poured out to us all heaven in one gift” (Steps to Christ, p. 21, 1892). A passage from the same little volume reminds us where to begin our reading of His character, since “nature and revelation alike testify of God’s love” (Steps to Christ, p. 9, 1892). The prophetic messenger draws an even tenderer picture of the Father’s heart toward the wandering, for “it was God who in His love made provision for the redemption of fallen humanity” (Steps to Christ, p. 13, 1892). The inspired pen warns against any caricature of Heaven that turns the Father into the antagonist of the Son, since “the Father loves us, not because of the great propitiation, but He provided the propitiation because He loves us” (Steps to Christ, p. 13, 1892). Pioneer writings of E.J. Waggoner pressed this same point upon a generation tempted to fear God instead of trusting Him; he insisted that the law and the cross belong to one heart of love. The very transparency of the books of record therefore proves that God has nothing to hide and that His mercy is entirely just.

A persistent caricature of the Father has burdened the Christian conscience for centuries and must be answered with quiet doctrinal clarity. Some traditions have pictured the Father as a stern judge held back from cruelty only by the intervention of a tender Son. Other traditions have so emphasized predestination that the love of God appeared to be reserved for a hidden few while withheld from the rest of humanity. The pioneer pen of A.T. Jones argued at length from Romans that the gospel of free grace is for every soul who will receive it, and that the records of heaven simply reveal the answer each person has given to the Spirit’s call. The judgment is therefore not a closed door against the seeking heart but an open courtroom into which any honest sinner may yet bring his confession through the Advocate. The Father is the source of the cross rather than the obstacle that the cross overcame, and the Son and the Father work in perfect unity for the rescue of the lost. Practical devotional life flows from this restored picture in unfailing peace and steady boldness in prayer. The community must therefore guard its preaching against the residual fear-mongering of older creeds and present the doctrine of judgment in the warm and serious light in which the prophetic messenger has framed it. Family worship in particular should anchor the children in the love of the Father rather than in the dread of an angry magistrate. We close with the question that opens the next section, for in light of so great a love, what does this judgment require of me toward God and toward my neighbor?

Justice and mercy are not opposing principles in the divine character but the two sides of one undivided love. The cross of Calvary is the place where they meet without contradiction, and the courtroom in heaven is the place where they continue to meet in the cases of the living. Justice is satisfied because the Substitute has paid the penalty in full, and mercy is satisfied because the sinner is restored to the family of God through faith. The pioneer Adventist preachers loved to quote the eighty-fifth psalm, in which mercy and truth are met together and righteousness and peace have kissed each other. This harmony silences every objection that the judgment is harsh, since the same God who weighs every motive also bore every motive on Himself in the person of the Son. The community is therefore invited to lay aside both the legalistic fear that thinks God too strict and the antinomian presumption that thinks God too lenient. The judgment is a shepherding doctrine, calculated to bring us to a calm, sober, intelligent walk with the Father through the merits of the Son. Devotional life flourishes in this warmth, since the believer no longer hides from God but draws near with confidence and a clean conscience.

WHAT DUTY BINDS US TO GOD AND MAN?

The judgment lays a double obligation upon every soul who has come within the reach of its message. Personal cleansing belongs to me as a single accountable person; warning and witness belong to us as a community in the closing hour. Paul gave the personal command in immediate, present tense, urging, “Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Corinthians 7:1, KJV). The prophet Micah summed up the full content of duty toward Heaven in three short clauses, for “he hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God” (Micah 6:8, KJV). Solomon stated the duty of warning toward those drifting toward death, writing, “If thou forbear to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain; if thou sayest, Behold, we knew it not; doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it?” (Proverbs 24:11, 12, KJV). Ezekiel pressed the same charge on every watchman of the Lord, recording, “When I say unto the wicked, Thou shalt surely die; and thou givest him not warning… his blood will I require at thine hand” (Ezekiel 3:18, KJV). The Saviour set out the great commission with a horizon as wide as the world, commanding, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19, KJV). The same Lord laid the duty of mutual love upon His disciples in lines that test every profession, for “a new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another” (John 13:34, KJV).

In Testimonies for the Church we read the framing principle for the whole of our walk, since “our responsibility is greater than was that of our ancestors. We are accountable for the light which they received and which was handed down as an inheritance for us” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 5, p. 456, 1882). Through inspired counsel we are told that authentic witness will outweigh skillful argument, for “the greatest want of the world is the want of men—men who will not be bought or sold, men who in their inmost souls are true and honest” (Education, p. 57, 1903). The inspired pen calls every household into the labor of the gospel, declaring, “Every son and daughter of God is called to be a missionary; we are called to the service of God and our fellow men” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 395, 1905). A passage from Christ’s Object Lessons fixes the spirit of all such service, since “Christ’s method alone will give true success in reaching the people. The Saviour mingled with men as one who desired their good” (The Ministry of Healing, p. 143, 1905). The prophetic messenger reminds us how high the standard of personal devotion runs, for “higher than the highest human thought can reach is God’s ideal for His children. Godliness—godlikeness—is the goal to be reached” (Education, p. 18, 1903). In Testimonies for the Church we read the corresponding word about communal responsibility, since “we are not to be content with going to heaven ourselves; we are to seek to bring others with us” (Testimonies for the Church, vol. 6, p. 433, 1900). The pioneer voice of S.N. Haskell, in his sanctuary studies, urged that the work of the heavenly High Priest be paralleled on earth by an earnest, sober, missionary spirit among His people. Personal duty toward God therefore drives me to inward cleansing, while communal duty drives us together into open testimony to the world.

The third angel’s message of Revelation fourteen translates these duties into a public mission upon the closing generation. The pioneer preachers proclaimed the everlasting gospel, the warning against Babylon, and the call to keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. That message has not been withdrawn, nor has its urgency been softened by the passage of time. I must therefore ask whether my private walk supports the public proclamation that the community is sent to deliver. Daily devotion becomes the spring of public testimony, since the rivers of living water cannot flow from a believer who has not first drunk at the throne. The household becomes the first mission field, for parents are charged with the spiritual education of their children and grandchildren in the closing hours. Quiet works of mercy in the neighborhood, faithful labor at the workplace, and steady visitation among the sick and the lonely form the fabric of authentic discipleship. The community must equally guard against the temptation of hiring out its mission to a salaried few, since every member of the body has a charge under the great commission. The pioneer pen of S.N. Haskell tirelessly pressed the point that personal Bible work in homes is the chosen means of preparing souls for the closing crisis. We close with the question that opens the next section, for what kind of character must develop in us before the records can be sealed and approved?

Practical translation of these duties into ordinary weeks deserves brief, concrete attention. Toward God, daily life must hold a fixed time of secret prayer, a fixed time of Bible reading, a faithful keeping of the Sabbath, and a sober care of the body that is His temple. Toward neighbor, the same week must hold acts of intentional service, the giving of literature or witness, financial stewardship beyond mere tithe, and the patient work of restoring those who have wandered. The community gathers each Sabbath not as an audience but as a corporate witness, a body that prays for the world during the closing hours of the antitypical Day of Atonement. The pioneer pen of A.T. Jones reminded the church repeatedly that the gospel of free grace produces a more vigorous, not a more complacent, working life. Where private holiness is lacking, public mission grows shallow, and where public mission is lacking, private holiness slips into private piety. The two duties therefore feed one another in the soul that has welcomed the present truth. We must hold both with steady hands as we approach the close of probation and the seal of the living God.

WHEN MUST CHARACTER BE FIXED FOREVER?

Readiness for the verdict is not produced by a single moment of feeling but by daily growth into the character of Christ. Heaven is the home of holiness, and only those who love its atmosphere here will be at home there. The writer of Hebrews stated the standard without softening, declaring, “Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord” (Hebrews 12:14, KJV). The apostle John tied present hope to present purification, writing, “And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure” (1 John 3:3, KJV). The Lord Himself raised the standard above any worldly average, commanding, “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48, KJV). Moses passed the same call into the camp of Israel, recording, “Sanctify yourselves therefore, and be ye holy: for I am the LORD your God” (Leviticus 20:7, KJV). Paul described the inward exchange that produces such a character, urging, “And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness” (Ephesians 4:24, KJV). The same apostle reduced the entire process to a single divine purpose, since “this is the will of God, even your sanctification, that ye should abstain from fornication” (1 Thessalonians 4:3, KJV).

In Christ’s Object Lessons we read the most concentrated statement of the work in our generation, for “Christ is waiting with longing desire for the manifestation of Himself in His church. When the character of Christ shall be perfectly reproduced in His people, then He will come to claim them as His own” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 69, 1900). The inspired pen further insists on the seriousness of the formation now under way, since “the greatest want of the world is the want of men—men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole” (Education, p. 57, 1903). Through inspired counsel we are told that no other treasure crosses the boundary of death, for “the character which we now reveal is deciding our future destiny” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 74, 1900). A passage from the same volume warns against any pretended righteousness that lacks transformation, since “many who profess to be Christians are mere human moralists. They have refused the gift which alone could enable them to honor Christ” (Christ’s Object Lessons, p. 315, 1900). The prophetic messenger reminds us that the close of probation finds the character finished, declaring, “Those who are living upon the earth when the intercession of Christ shall cease in the sanctuary above are to stand in the sight of a holy God without a mediator” (The Great Controversy, p. 425, 1911). In The Great Controversy we read the corresponding word, since “their robes must be spotless, their characters must be purified from sin by the blood of sprinkling” (The Great Controversy, p. 425, 1911). The pioneer pen of A.T. Jones repeatedly pressed home from Romans and Galatians that this purity is received by faith in the indwelling Christ rather than achieved by the energies of the unconverted heart. Daily surrender therefore writes upon the soul the lines that the Judge already approves in His Son.

Sanctification is the patient work of a lifetime rather than the sudden achievement of a single moment. Justification is the legal verdict that declares the believing sinner righteous on the basis of the merit of Christ. Sanctification is the daily transformation that makes the believing sinner inwardly like Christ in motive, thought, and habit. The two cannot be separated in genuine experience, for the same grace that pardons also purifies, and the same Lord who forgives also indwells. Pioneer pen of E.J. Waggoner pressed both truths together at the historic Minneapolis sessions, and warned that any preaching of judgment without the indwelling Christ produces only legalistic fear. Character is not the outward polish that society respects, but the inward harmony of the soul with the law of God revealed in the life of Christ. We are therefore called to perfection of character, not perfection of fallen nature, since the redeemed will continue to grow throughout eternity. Practical disciplines support this growth, including daily Bible reading, secret prayer, the temperate care of the body, the keeping of the Sabbath, and the continual practice of self-denial in small things. Communal practice supports the personal work, for public worship, the ordinances of humility and the Lord’s Supper, and faithful tithing all train the soul into Christlikeness. We close with the question that opens the next section, for what sudden silence falls when the door of probation finally closes?

Specific habits of life shape the character that the judgment approves. Morning devotion sets the tone for the entire day, since the soul that meets God before any human voice has been heard receives strength to meet every later trial. Family worship at the evening meal binds the household into a praying unit and protects the children from the spirit of the age. The Sabbath, when kept in the simple, joyful manner of the pioneers, restores the soul each week and keeps the great commandments alive in the heart. Health reform supports holiness rather than competing with it, for a clear mind, a temperate appetite, and a strong body are all aids to spiritual growth. Faithful tithing teaches the soul that we are stewards rather than owners of our possessions, and weekly offerings train the hand in the joy of giving. The choice of reading, music, conversation, and recreation must all be brought under the same simple test, namely whether they prepare the soul for the presence of God. The community must therefore expect of every member a serious, life-long discipline of formation, since heaven is not a present from above but a destination prepared for. The records will reflect what we actually become through grace, not what we briefly intended in seasons of feeling.

WHAT FALLS WHEN PROBATION CLOSES?

The close of probation marks the final and unalterable fixation of every human destiny. The High Priest will lay down His mediatorial garments, and the gospel call will fall silent forever. The Lord announced the suddenness of His coming and the prior settling of every account, declaring, “And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be” (Revelation 22:12, KJV). The same chapter records the final fixation of moral state in arresting words, for “he that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still” (Revelation 22:11, KJV). Daniel saw the closing labor of Michael standing up at the head of His people, recording, “And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people” (Daniel 12:1, KJV). The same vision divided the world by the result of the judgment, declaring, “Many shall be purified, and made white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand” (Daniel 12:10, KJV). John saw the unmediated wrath that follows the silence of the sanctuary, writing, “For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?” (Revelation 6:17, KJV). Paul fixed the urgency of the present invitation in language no procrastination can soften, urging, “Behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians 6:2, KJV).

In The Great Controversy we read the precise moment in heaven when probation ends, since “when the work of the investigative judgment closes, the destiny of all will have been decided for life or death” (The Great Controversy, p. 490, 1911). The inspired pen places this moment in the immediate prelude to the second coming, for “the time is at hand when, as foretold by the prophets, the morning stars shall sing together, and the sons of God shall shout for joy” (The Great Controversy, p. 308, 1911). Through inspired counsel we are told the very voice of decision that closes the work, since “Christ will then declare: He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he that is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still” (The Great Controversy, p. 613, 1911). A passage from the same volume describes the laying down of the mediatorial robes, for “He lays off His priestly attire and clothes Himself with garments of vengeance” (The Great Controversy, p. 614, 1911). The prophetic messenger warns of the danger of presuming on time we have not been promised, declaring, “Satan is now using every device in this sealing time to keep the minds of God’s people from the present truth” (Early Writings, p. 43, 1851). In The Great Controversy we read the steady pastoral counsel for the present hour, since “let none look on at this great work and think that they are in no danger. We are in the great day of atonement, and we should now be searching the books” (Review and Herald, March 28, 1893). The pioneer pen of James White wrote often that the present truth of the third angel’s message is the only message adequate to prepare a people for the closing scenes of earth’s history. We must therefore lay every weight aside today, while the Advocate still stands within the veil and the door has not yet shut.

The pioneer interpretation of the closing crisis pictured a final test centered on the law of God and especially on the seventh-day Sabbath. The Sunday-law agitation was watched with sober concern by James White, Uriah Smith, and the prophetic messenger as a sign that probation might draw near to its close. The latter rain of the Spirit was expected to fall upon a prepared people, enabling them to give the loud cry of the third angel with mighty effect. The very crisis that closes the door of mercy for the unyielding will also bring the seal of the living God upon the foreheads of the faithful. We dare not postpone any duty in the hope that revival will come at the last moment without preparation, for character cannot be hurried into existence at the eleventh hour. The community is called now to the work of reformation in diet, in dress, in speech, in family life, and in stewardship, so that the latter rain may find a clean vessel ready to receive it. The pioneer preachers of the third angel’s message warned in plain words that there will be no second probation after the close of the heavenly intercession. Today, while the books still lie open and while the Advocate still pleads at the mercy seat, every believer is invited to the deepest sincerity of repentance and to the highest reach of consecration. The closing scenes are upon us, and the cry of the bridegroom approaches in the watches of this last night. We end the article in the same posture in which we began, looking up to the open courtroom and pressing forward in living union with our High Priest.

A final word concerning the latter rain and the loud cry deserves a steady place in our thinking. The early or former rain fell at Pentecost and prepared the church for the proclamation of the gospel through the apostolic age. The latter rain is promised at the close of earthly history and will prepare the remnant church for the final proclamation of the third angel’s message. Pioneer pen of James White and the prophetic messenger together insisted that the latter rain falls on the same heart soil that the former rain has prepared. We are therefore not waiting passively for a future shower; we are inviting the present work of the Spirit by daily surrender, fervent prayer, and earnest study of the word. The loud cry will accompany the latter rain and will lighten the earth with the glory of God before the final crisis breaks. Sleeping virgins will be awakened, the honest in heart in every fallen church will hear the voice of the Shepherd, and the visible body of the remnant will be gathered in the closing months. We who have been entrusted with the present truth therefore have no leisure for postponed obedience. Today, while mercy still lingers and the books still lie open, every quiet decision of obedience deepens our preparation for the closing scenes.

“And he said unto me, Thou must prophesy again before many peoples, and nations, and tongues, and kings” (Revelation 10:11, KJV).

For more articles, please go to www.faithfundamentals.blog or our podcast at: https://rss.com/podcasts/the-lamb.

SELF-REFLECTION

How can the community in devotional life delve deeper into these prophetic truths allowing them to shape character and priorities?

How can the community adapt these themes to be understandable and relevant to diverse audiences without compromising accuracy?

What common misconceptions exist about judgment and prophecy and how can Scripture and Sr. White gently correct them?

In what practical ways can congregations become vibrant beacons living out Christ’s soon return and victory over evil?

If you have a prayer request, please send it to the following email: prayer-M@rvel-usa.com. Prayer meetings are held on Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. To join, enter your email address in the comments section.

Leave a comment